U.S. Sentencing Commission report lists estimated number of defendants eligible for a retroactive reduction by district and type of offense.
Amendment 821 Part A and Part B Sentence Reduction By District and Type of Offense
Retroactive Application of Amendment 821 Part B: Zero Point Offender Infographic
Sentencing Stats official Infographic Guide to U.S. Sentencing Commission’s Amendment 821, §4A1.1 PartB (retroactive), otherwise known as the Zero Point Offender reduction.
Law360: How Zero-Point Offender Change Should Work Retroactively
Read the latest expert opinion on Law360. co-authored by SentencingStats.com President Mark Allenbaugh, advisor Doug Passon legendary Federal attorney Alan Ellis predict how the Zero-Point Offender amendment (Amendment 821 Part A) will be implemented.
Danny Masterson Sentencing Analysis
Danny Masterson Sentencing Analysis
Retroactive Application of Amendment 821 Part A: Status Points Amendment Infographic
Sentencing Stats official Infographic Guide to U.S. Sentencing Commission’s Amendment 821, §4A1.1 Part A (retroactive), otherwise known as Criminal History Status Points reduction.
Retroactive Application of Amendment 821 ZPO and Status Point Amendments
The Zero Point Offender and Status Point modifications to the Sentencing Guidelines go into effect on November 1. They are RETROACTIVE. But not everyone knows whether they may benefit from the changes or how to go about getting that benefit. Therefore, helping us get Set for Sentencing, Mark Allenbaugh, and Keith Hilzendeger to tell us
SentencingStats founder Mark Allenbaugh talks Amendment 821 / Zero Point Offender with Forbes Magazine
Forbes: What The US Sentencing Commission’s Decision Means For First Time Offenders
SentencingStats.com announces program to Assist with Retroactive Application of Amendment 821
SentencingStats.com to assist with retroactive application of Amendment 821, offering analytics, services and tools for resentencing eligible federal inmates.
Introduction to USSC Amendment 821 Part A & B: Zero Point Offender / Status Points Reductions
Policy Priorities: The Commission discussed and voted on the final policy priorities for the period of 2023-2024. These priorities would guide the Commission’s work in establishing sentencing policies and practices for federal courts. Retroactivity of Parts A and B of the 2023 Criminal History Amendment: A significant decision involved voting on the retroactivity of Parts
Pre-Trial Detention Through the Lens of Sam Bankman-Fried (and DJT)
When a judge decides to imprison a client before their trial, even though they haven’t been convicted and are presumed innocent, it effectively bypasses the usual legal process. It’s like skipping the initial steps and going straight to sentencing, without any chance to collect resources or build a defense. The practice of pre-trial detention should